- From: Paul Hoffman <paulh@imc.org>
- Date: Wed, 27 Dec 1995 11:50:13 -0800
- To: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
>> And, on a separate note, I'll be taking the "Allow" header out of the 1.0 >> doc since only one known server appears to emit it. Worse, that one server >> does it incorrectly (it always emits GET HEAD POST even for URIs where POST >> is not allowed...). > >That means there's at least three, because I know of two (AWS and >AServe) that implement Allow and don't include POST where it is not >allowed. Spyglass also reports that they use the header, so I'll leave it in. This was not true in September when I ran the survey. I'll be running another in early January, I hope. --Paul Hoffman --Internet Mail Consortium
Received on Wednesday, 27 December 1995 11:52:18 UTC