Re: Moving HTTP 1.0 to informational

>> And, on a separate note, I'll be taking the "Allow" header out of the 1.0
>> doc since only one known server appears to emit it. Worse, that one server
>> does it incorrectly (it always emits GET HEAD POST even for URIs where POST
>> is not allowed...).
>That means there's at least three, because I know of two (AWS and
>AServe) that implement Allow and don't include POST where it is not

Spyglass also reports that they use the header, so I'll leave it in. This
was not true in September when I ran the survey. I'll be running another in
early January, I hope.

--Paul Hoffman
--Internet Mail Consortium

Received on Wednesday, 27 December 1995 11:52:18 UTC