Roy T. Fielding wrote: > > > I found descrepency in Hopmann specification about connection > > oriented HTTP extension draft. I also confirmed the conflict > > with Mr Hopmann. Iam attaching part of the mail message > > with this note for other server developers.Please correct > > the information in your downloaded version of the draft > > We are not proceeding with the specification that Alex wrote. > Persistent connections were already implemented by several vendors > using the notes I produced early this year, and which I reposted > to the mailing list last month. Please see > > http://www.ics.uci.edu/pub/ietf/http/hypermail/ > I couldn't find your notes, and I have a question. Did your proposal include multipart/mixed responses for keep-alive cgi scripts? That seems to be what everyone is implementing. I'm not happy with using the "multipart/mixed" name. I would prefer "multipart/x-http-response" or something like it so that we don't have name space collision with email messages. :lou -- Lou Montulli http://www.netscape.com/people/montulli/ Netscape Communications Corp.Received on Monday, 13 November 1995 16:20:02 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:42:56 UTC