- From: Shel Kaphan <sjk@amazon.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Oct 1995 17:34:13 -0700
- To: Jeffrey Mogul <mogul@pa.dec.com>
- Cc: "Eric W. Sink" <eric@rafiki.spyglass.com>, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Jeffrey Mogul writes: ... > (c) The "stored-state" stuff ought to be carried in a new header > named "Stored-state". > > -Jeff As long as we're making iconoclastic suggestions today, I'd like to suggest that unless someone can put forward some *quantitative* results that indicate that there is enough of a savings involved in this kind of connection state such that these savings would not be easily swamped by, say, one small GIF file, that introduction of this mechanism into the spec be delayed until there has been a chance to experiment with it. --Shel
Received on Friday, 20 October 1995 17:43:51 UTC