W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-discuss@w3.org > June 2001

RE: Scheduling for London

From: Hollenbeck, Scott <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 17:49:31 -0400
Message-ID: <DF737E620579D411A8E400D0B77E671D01878079@regdom-ex01.prod.netsol.com>
To: "'Randy Bush'" <randy@psg.com>
Cc: discuss@apps.ietf.org, ietf-whois@imc.org
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Randy Bush [mailto:randy@psg.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 5:15 PM
> To: Hollenbeck, Scott
> Cc: discuss@apps.ietf.org; ietf-whois@imc.org
> Subject: RE: Scheduling for London 
> > How relevant do folks see the work previously agreed to within ICANN
> > to prescribe the info that must be returned in response to a domain name
> > query?
> not to port 43 whois.  but we've had this discussion before, 
> have we not?

Indeed we have, with the chaotic results described earlier on this thread.
Now that Dave's question regarding how we managed to get bogged down has
been partially answered, we should carefully consider the scope of a BoF
agenda to make sure that we don't resurrect this topic again -- with the
possible exception of being very clear that it's _not_ relevant.

Received on Wednesday, 20 June 2001 17:59:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:08:12 UTC