W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > January 2006

Re: xsd:simpletype or <xsd:complexType with simpleContent?

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 13:58:53 +0000
To: Dan Vint <dvint@dvint.com>
Cc: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Message-ID: <f5br77ci602.fsf@erasmus.inf.ed.ac.uk>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Dan Vint writes:

> I'll have to check into this more. This was in terms of redfine - my
> original statement.

Sorry, I missed the redefine part before.  In that case, you're right.

ht
- -- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDx7IdkjnJixAXWBoRAtDHAJ0alFmGduSZpITUI5emS9r3FbTTUQCfZ0gE
I2eRCp6xE2uOAYvJA5pvMYI=
=0nyv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Friday, 13 January 2006 13:59:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 January 2011 00:14:52 GMT