W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > January 2006

RE: abstract elements and xsi:type substitution

From: Sandy Gao <sandygao@ca.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:25:54 -0500
To: "Stan Kitsis" <skits@microsoft.com>
Cc: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF499371C3.517BA2C7-ON852570F5.004EB655-852570F5.004F4729@ca.ibm.com>
I can not comment on the *intent*, because the relative clauses existed 
before I joined the schema WG. FWIW, I have raised a similar issue and 
proposed a solution [1].

[1] 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2005JanMar/0033.html

Thanks,
Sandy Gao
XML Parser Development, IBM Canada
(1-905) 413-3255
sandygao@ca.ibm.com


xmlschema-dev-request@w3.org wrote on 01/12/2006 05:15:07 PM:

> Currently both system.xml and MSXML go through the 1.2 clause and 
> accept the xml instance as valid.  We had a few discussions on this 
> along the lines of Michael?s response and some of us think that the 
_intent
> _ of the spec was not to allow abstract elements in the instance 
> documents regardless of xsi:type (as Sandy commented).  So we wanted
> to see what others thought.
> 
> Anybody else wants to comment on the _intent_ of the spec?
> 
> Stan
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Stan Kitsis,
> Webdata - XML
> Microsoft Corporation
> --------------------------------------
Received on Friday, 13 January 2006 14:25:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 January 2011 00:14:52 GMT