xml-dist-app@w3.org from February 2007 by author

Anish Karmarkar

• Re: [NEW ISSUE] granularirty of MTOM policy assertion (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: RRSHB schema (Sunday, 11 February)
• RRSHB schema (Saturday, 10 February)

Christopher B Ferris

• Re: [NEW ISSUE] granularirty of MTOM policy assertion (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: [NEW ISSUE] namespace name for MTOM policy assertion (Wednesday, 21 February)
• [NEW ISSUE] granularirty of MTOM policy assertion (Tuesday, 20 February)
• [NEW ISSUE] namespace name for MTOM policy assertion (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: CR148 analysis (Friday, 9 February)

Jean-Jacques Moreau

• Re: [NEW ISSUE] granularity of MTOM policy assertion (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: [SPAM] Re: CR148 analysis (Friday, 9 February)

Jonathan Marsh

• RE: CR148 analysis (Friday, 9 February)

Mark Baker

• Re: CR148 analysis (Friday, 9 February)

noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

• Re: RRSHB schema (Sunday, 11 February)
• Re: RRSHB schema (Sunday, 11 February)
• Re: CR148 analysis (Friday, 9 February)

Yves Lafon

• Re: RRSHB schema (Wednesday, 21 February)

Last message date: Wednesday, 21 February 2007 18:00:20 UTC