W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > February 2007

Re: [NEW ISSUE] granularity of MTOM policy assertion

From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 17:58:39 +0100
Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org
Message-id: <45DB28BF.9050609@crf.canon.fr>

+1, we should be able to set the assertion at the message/operation 
level (SOAP/WSDL terminology). Another example that comes to mind is 
SOAP-Reponse, i.e. a GET/POST request followed by an MTOM response.

JJ.

Christopher B Ferris wrote:
>
> Title: granularity of MTOM policy assertion
>
> Description: The assertion requires all messages, regardless of 
> whether there is binary content, to be sent as
> application/xop+xml. Is this correct behavior? Shouldn't the assertion 
> granularity be finer, e.g. such that a client
> could send a SOAP request (application/soap+xml) and receive an MTOM 
> response (application/xop+xml)
> and vice-versa?
>
> Justification: seems odd at best to send xop serialized message even 
> when there is no binary content.
>
> Type: technical
>
> Proposal:  TBD
>
> Cheers,
>
> Christopher Ferris
> STSM, Software Group Standards Strategy
> email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
> blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/chrisferris
> phone: +1 508 377 9295 
Received on Tuesday, 20 February 2007 16:59:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:23 GMT