I added this to Bugzilla: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4340 Cheers, Christopher Ferris STSM, Software Group Standards Strategy email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/chrisferris phone: +1 508 377 9295 xml-dist-app-request@w3.org wrote on 02/20/2007 08:27:54 AM: > > All, > > It would help if all issues raised against the MTOM policy spec [1] > follow this format. > > Title: namespace name for MTOM policy assertion > > Description: We need a namespace name for MTOM policy assertion. The > W3C is moving towards a new scheme > for assigning namespaces that take the form: http://www.w3. > org/ns/[shortname]. This issue serves as a placeholder for > choosing the final namespace for this assertion. > > Justification: We need a w3c assigned namespace. > > Type: editorial > > Proposal: http://www.w3.org/ns/soap12-mtom-policy > > Note that I am proposing that the shortname be a follow-on to the > MTOM REC shortname, simply adding '-policy'. > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/REC-soap12-mtom-20050125/ > > Cheers, > > Christopher Ferris > STSM, Software Group Standards Strategy > email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com > blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/chrisferris > phone: +1 508 377 9295Received on Wednesday, 21 February 2007 12:32:42 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:42:06 GMT