RE: XP Service URIs

Ah, I see, you are talking about the request-URI so to speak - I thought
you meant "service" as in "module".

It does make a lot of sense to have a header that knows about the XP (or
SOAP) message path model and can indicate under what conditions to send
the message to whom etc. However, I don't think it should be required as
several protocol bindings (most of the *transfer* protocols like HTTP,
SMTP etc.) have mechanisms for indicating where to send the message.

Henrik

> Confused - the service URI will most likely *not* be the XMLNS of the
> message/modules...