W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > November 2000

Re: XP Service URIs

From: MOREAU Jean-Jacques <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2000 09:49:25 +0100
Message-ID: <3A1E2B95.2A1FBAFF@crf.canon.fr>
To: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <frystyk@microsoft.com>, "xml-dist-app@w3.org" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Henrik Frystyk Nielsen wrote:

> However, I don't think it should be required as
> several protocol bindings (most of the *transfer* protocols like HTTP,
> SMTP etc.) have mechanisms for indicating where to send the message.

We have one requirement which states that we will support requests using
different protocols along the way. To support such transcoders, it might be
better to put information such as the service URI within the request's
header. It will make it easier to shield the transcoder from the ingress and
outgress protocols.

That being said, it's fine for me if it's a MAY, as Henry suggested.

Jean-Jacques.
Received on Friday, 24 November 2000 03:53:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:57 GMT