Confused - the service URI will most likely *not* be the XMLNS of the message/modules... On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 02:16:47PM -0800, Henrik Frystyk Nielsen wrote: > > I think it would be good to require the envelope to *support* > > identification of > > the URI. I don't necessarily think that the URI should be a > > required element. > > SOAP [2] depends on XML namespaces to identify SOAP modules (using > terminology from [1]). The question is then to say whether XML NS are > mandatory or optional and at what level. > > SOAP requires that all immediate child elements of the SOAP Header > element MUST be namespace-qualified and that all immediate child > elements of the SOAP Body element MAY be namespace-qualified. > > Given the division between headers and body I think this is a reasonable > choice although one could argue that the latter could be a SHOULD. As > SOAP doesn't depend on anything lower than the immediate child elements > of Header and Body, it makes sense not to say anything about how Modules > use XML NS. > > Henrik > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xp-terms-01.html > [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/SOAP > -- Mark Nottingham, Research Scientist Akamai Technologies (San Mateo, CA)Received on Tuesday, 21 November 2000 17:22:32 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:10 UTC