W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > September 2003

RE: On WSDL "operation"

From: Champion, Mike <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 07:39:16 -0600
Message-ID: <9A4FC925410C024792B85198DF1E97E4068C22ED@usmsg03.sagus.com>
To: 'WS Description List' <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Webber [mailto:jim.webber@arjuna.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 4:52 AM
> To: 'Mark Baker'; 'Umit Yalcinalp'
> Cc: 'WS Description List'
> Subject: RE: On WSDL "operation"
> 

> It could be as simple as re-naming "operation" to something 
> like "messageExchange."

Yeah, but a WSDL "operation" presumably DOES something.  It's not just a
message for the sake of sending bits around.  How about "serviceInvocation"
or "serviceRequest" or something along those lines? If a WSDL message does
anything, it does request that a service be performed by the provider on
behalf of the requester [the current WSA terminology, IIRC].  
Received on Tuesday, 16 September 2003 09:39:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:26 GMT