W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > July 2002

Re: Seeking closure on D-AR019.1.1 and D-AR019.1.3

From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 15:57:19 -0400
To: "ECKERT,ZULAH (HP-Cupertino,ex1)" <zulah_eckert@hp.com>
Cc: "WSA W3C Public (E-mail)" <www-ws-arch@w3c.org>
Message-ID: <20020724155719.R17456@www.markbaker.ca>

On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 12:03:24PM -0700, ECKERT,ZULAH (HP-Cupertino,ex1) wrote:
> At the WSAWG 7/11/02 meeting [2], AC019 [1] was partially approved. The
> following draft requirements from AC019 were not approved: 
> 
> D-AR019.1.1 Web Services Architecture will enable discovery of a relocated
> Web Service.

I'm ok with this one, but FWIW, it could be said to be a subset of
the requirement I championed to define or identify an interface that
all Web services can offer (I don't think we have a number for this one
yet).  So it could be removed, or maybe moved under it.  Just a thought.

> D-AR019.1.3 Web Services Architecture will incorporate support for reliable
> messaging.

I've made my objections well known.  Here's some alternatives I could
live with;

.. will not preclude support for reliable messaging

.. will support the ability for components to reliably coordinate
tasks over an unreliable network.  This may include solutions such as
reliable messaging, the definition of a coordination language, other
as-yet-unidentified solutions, or some combination thereof.

Basically, I'd like the wording to not imply that the best way in
which to achieve reliability over a network, is to ensure that every
message is delivered reliably.

Thanks.

MB
-- 
Mark Baker, CTO, Idokorro Mobile (formerly Planetfred)
Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.               distobj@acm.org
http://www.markbaker.ca        http://www.idokorro.com
Received on Wednesday, 24 July 2002 15:45:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:02 GMT