W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > July 2002

RE: [STF] STF Concall Minutes 7/22/02

From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 12:30:55 -0700
To: "'Hugo Haas'" <hugo@w3.org>, <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
Message-ID: <048301c23348$a277d760$0100007f@beasys.com>

The main reason I wanted the discussions public is because I believe that is
the spirit of the "Working group discussions are done in public" charter
aspect.  I'm almost convinced that public working group discussions are bad,
but our charter is public.  And I'm not too interested in debating the
letter vs spirit of the charter, so let's just do the obvious thing that
seems intended by our charter.  Again note that this is because of what I
interpret a principle that we agreed to operate under, as opposed to what I
believe is the best modus operandi.

Cheers,
Dave

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-arch-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-arch-request@w3.org]On
> Behalf Of Hugo Haas
> Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 11:48 AM
> To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
> Subject: Re: [STF] STF Concall Minutes 7/22/02
>
>
>
> * Joseph Hui <Joseph.Hui@exodus.net> [2002-07-24 11:38-0700]
> > >From my standpoint it's imperative that there be no misconception
> > that the STF was concocting things behind closed doors, even though
> > this may mean disappointing the conspiracy buffs.
> >
> > In the interest of honest record keeping, i.e. making sure the
> > posted meeting minutes accurately reflect what went on in the
> > last meeting, can you fill me in who was the "one Working Group
> > member outside the taskforce [who] expressed his desire to follow
> > those discussions?"
>
> I was refering to Dave's comment in www-ws-arch[1]. He isn't on the
> taskforce but would like to see all the discussions in www-ws-arch.
>
> As I said, I was happy to use the www-archive public archive since
> people wanted it that way, but somebody outside of the taskforce
> explicitely asked for all discussions to happen on www-ws-arch, so we
> should do so as mandated by our process.
>
> > I didn't hear anyone expressing such desire during the meeting.
> > Besides, all attendees were either STF members, or an invited
> > guest from OASIS, who is not a Working Group member.
>
> Hal is actually a taskforce and Working Group member, representing
> OASIS as listed in [2].
>
> Regards,
>
> Hugo
>
>   1. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-arch/2002Jul/0407.html
>   2. http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/arch/#participants
> --
> Hugo Haas - W3C
> mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/ -
> tel:+1-617-452-2092
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 24 July 2002 15:32:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:02 GMT