W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > September 2003

Re: OWL Test Results page, built from RDF

From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 13:01:52 -0400
Message-Id: <200309101701.h8AH1q8t022838@roke.hawke.org>
To: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org


> 1) It would be good if someone could extract a list of proposed tests with
> one or more systems that pass them, ideally with the list of systems next to
> each test. We could then use that as the basis to approve a load of tests.

Done.  Now on the page.

> 2) I do not think that Peter's system should be viewed as passing all the
> syntactic tests.
> In particular it does not distinguish OWL Lite from OWL DL.
> 
> I would suggest marking the OWL Lite Syntax tests as Incompletely passed by
> Peter's system.

Peter, do you agree?    Do you plan on maintaining the data, or should
someone just do this one-time change?

> 3)
> I note that the five approved tests that we are not passing suggests that we
> approved them rather too quickly.

We still don't have results on the page from FaCT, Racer, Cerebra,
Jena, ... etc.

    -- sandro
Received on Wednesday, 10 September 2003 13:03:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:02 GMT