W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > September 2003

RE: OWL Test Results page, built from RDF

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 15:56:08 +0200
To: "Sandro Hawke" <sandro@w3.org>, "Sean Bechhofer" <seanb@cs.man.ac.uk>
Cc: <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BHEGLCKMOHGLGNOKPGHDAEAACCAA.jjc@hpl.hp.com>



Three points:

1) It would be good if someone could extract a list of proposed tests with
one or more systems that pass them, ideally with the list of systems next to
each test. We could then use that as the basis to approve a load of tests.


2) I do not think that Peter's system should be viewed as passing all the
syntactic tests.
In particular it does not distinguish OWL Lite from OWL DL.

I would suggest marking the OWL Lite Syntax tests as Incompletely passed by
Peter's system.

(This is not trying to prejudice CR exit - if we had one OWL Syntax Checker
such as Sean's with the last fixes done, Peter's checker, and a system that
passed all the OWL Lite checks, then that is equivalent to having two OWL
Syntax Checkers.) I believe we have more than one such OWL Lite checker
already.

3)
I note that the five approved tests that we are not passing suggests that we
approved them rather too quickly.

Jeremy
Received on Tuesday, 9 September 2003 12:24:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:02 GMT