Re: OWL Test Results page, built from RDF

• From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
• Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 01:46:08 -0400 (EDT)
• To: sandro@w3.org
• Cc: jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com, www-webont-wg@w3.org
• Message-Id: <20030911.014608.63240811.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>

From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Subject: Re: OWL Test Results page, built from RDF 
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 13:01:52 -0400

[...]

> > 2) I do not think that Peter's system should be viewed as passing all the
> > syntactic tests.
> > In particular it does not distinguish OWL Lite from OWL DL.
> > 
> > I would suggest marking the OWL Lite Syntax tests as Incompletely passed by
> > Peter's system.
> 
> Peter, do you agree?    Do you plan on maintaining the data, or should
> someone just do this one-time change?

Actually, I expect to upgrade my syntax tool to check for OWL Lite, as it
is not very hard (I think).

I'll probably also produce RDF-ish output.

[...]

peter

Received on Thursday, 11 September 2003 01:47:37 UTC