W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > February 2003

Re: [TEST] Vocabulary usage in Tests

From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 00:41:47 +0100
To: "Dan Connolly <connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: Sean Bechhofer <seanb@cs.man.ac.uk>, WebOnt WG <www-webont-wg@w3.org>, www-webont-wg-request@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF17A6361C.4740294E-ONC1256CCB.0081903E-C1256CCB.00823453@agfa.be>


> Excellent detail work...

indeed

> On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 11:08, Sean Bechhofer wrote:
> > While trying to write a species validator, I've come across the
following,
> > which I think may be errors in the test suite.
> >
> > http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/miscellaneous/example001.rdf
> >
> > uses owl:InverseOf rather than owl:inverseOf.
> >
> > http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/miscellaneous/example002.rdf
> >
> > has an OWL namespace declaration of:
> >
> > http://www.w3.org/2002/7/owl
> >
> > i.e. "7" rather than "07".
>
> OK, I fixed both of those.
>
> $Id: example001.rdf,v 1.3 2003/02/12 20:00:39 connolly Exp $
> $Id: example002.rdf,v 1.3 2003/02/12 20:01:49 connolly Exp $
>
> Jos, those come from the guide, no?

Yes Dan they do and that's why I asked in
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0155.html
to
[[
I propose that the Guide editors update their
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/guide-src/wine.owl
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/guide-src/food.owl
(because they are the source documents
and I will then update the tests)
]]

> Is there any mechanism for checking that they stay
> in sync?

Well, manually I guess, which is the bane of our existence ;-)
(certainly if you have broken fingers ;-) hope it's going better)

-- ,
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Wednesday, 12 February 2003 18:42:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:57 GMT