W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > February 2003

RE: [TEST] Vocabulary usage in Tests

From: Smith, Michael K <michael.smith@eds.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 18:23:51 -0600
Message-ID: <B8E84F4D9F65D411803500508BE3221413C69DAA@USPLM207>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Sean Bechhofer <seanb@cs.man.ac.uk>
Cc: WebOnt WG <www-webont-wg@w3.org>

The /7/ => /07/ fix had been made.
Wine.owl had an InverseOf.  Fixed in next copy to go out.

- Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Connolly [mailto:connolly@w3.org]
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 3:52 PM
To: Sean Bechhofer
Cc: WebOnt WG
Subject: Re: [TEST] Vocabulary usage in Tests



Excellent detail work...

On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 11:08, Sean Bechhofer wrote:
> While trying to write a species validator, I've come across the following,
> which I think may be errors in the test suite.
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/miscellaneous/example001.rdf
> 
> uses owl:InverseOf rather than owl:inverseOf.
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/miscellaneous/example002.rdf
> 
> has an OWL namespace declaration of:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2002/7/owl
> 
> i.e. "7" rather than "07".

OK, I fixed both of those.

$Id: example001.rdf,v 1.3 2003/02/12 20:00:39 connolly Exp $
$Id: example002.rdf,v 1.3 2003/02/12 20:01:49 connolly Exp $

Jos, those come from the guide, no?

Is there any mechanism for checking that they stay
in sync?

>  In addition, within that file, there are
> occurrences of non-OWL vocabulary usage, such as hasClass on a
> Restriction.

I haven't fixed these... no time just now.

>  Of course there's nothing wrong with that as it's not in the
> OWL namespace :-)).

Oh, but there is; those are not OWL Full documents:

"An OWL Full document is an RDF/XML document [RDF/XML Syntax], for which
the corresponding RDF graph [RDF Concepts] does not use any URI
references starting with the prefix http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
except those found in the [RDF Schema for OWL]."
 -- http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/editors-draft/snapshot#docConformance


> http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/maxCardinality/example001.rdf
> http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/miscellaneous/example001.rdf
> http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/maxCardinality/example002.rdf
> 
> all use owl:differentIndividalFrom rather than owl:differentFrom.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> 	Sean
-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 12 February 2003 19:24:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:57 GMT