[Dan Connolly] XRIs are not designed to be URIs [Fwd: Re:xri: registration with IETF/IANA?]
[httpRange-14] a thought experiment was: Re: making progress on httpRange-14 -- yet another suggestion
[putMediaType-38] reopening discussion
[standardizedFieldValues-51] new issue on deploying new terms, media types, properties, elements, etc.
Addendum to TAG Review of XRI 2.0
Agenda of 10 May 2005 TAG teleconference
Agenda of 24 May 2005 TAG teleconference
Agenda of 3 May 2005 TAG teleconference
Agenda of 31 May 2005 TAG teleconference
Another potential new TAG issue: Use of <, >, and & in XML based data formats
Dave Orchard individual review of XBC for the TAG
httpRange-14: some dimensions of space of positions
making progress on httpRange-14 -- yet another suggestion
Minutes of TAG 2005-May-03 telcon attached
Minutes of TAG 2005-May-03 telcon attached (putMediaType-38, abstractComponentRefs-37, binaryXML-30, httpRange-14)
Potential new TAG issue: Content Selection for Device Independence (DISelect) 1.0
Tag meeting of 24 March 2005 was cancelled
Tag meeting of 24 May 2005 was cancelled (was: Tag meeting of 24 March 2005 was cancelled)
TAG minutes 2005-05-31 for review [fragmentInXML-28, SchemeProtocols-49, httpRange-14]
TAG opinion on XML Binary Format
- Jonathan Robie (Saturday, 28 May)
- Stephen D. Williams (Saturday, 28 May)
- Jonathan Robie (Friday, 27 May)
- Biron,Paul V (Friday, 27 May)
- Michael Champion (Friday, 27 May)
- John Schneider (Friday, 27 May)
- Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler) (Wednesday, 25 May)
- Rice, Ed (HP.com) (Wednesday, 25 May)
- noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com (Wednesday, 25 May)
- Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler) (Tuesday, 24 May)
- Rice, Ed (HP.com) (Tuesday, 24 May)
TAG telcon of 2005-05-10
TAG telcon of 2005-05-10 (URNsAndRegistries-50, binaryXML-30)
XML Schema Versioning Use Cases and XML Versioning mailing list
XRI 2.0 Review by the W3C TAG - security concern?
XRIs *are* intended to be used where URIs are used
Last message date: Tuesday, 31 May 2005 20:33:39 UTC