W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > June 2004

Re: TestGL draft

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 08:49:15 -0600
Message-Id: <>
To: Dimitris Dimitriadis <dimitris@ontologicon.com>
Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org
At 12:59 AM 6/5/2004 +0300, Dimitris Dimitriadis wrote:

>As promised during Wednesday's talk with Patrick, Lofton and Dom, I've 
>sent the document to Patrick for him to check.

 From the record of that talk,
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2004Jun/0006.html ,

** publish before f2f -- Friday 11th June at latest;
** DD/PC send new draft to QAWG:  by Friday 4th June (A.M. Eastern time);
** QAWG review/discussion:  Monday, 14th June QAWG telecon.

I.e., the finished draft was to be circulated to the QAWG by Friday morning 

Did I miss a message containing the draft?  (I.e., did it get anti-spammed 
here, like some incoming HTML messages do?)

>Please note that I have limited the work to the following:
>1. No proper layout since I want to gather all feedback and update the 
>document before publication, thought I'd do the layout at the same time 
>(this includes introductory/concluding sections)
>2. I've tried to incorporate as much as possible of the old operational 
>guidelines. Here I want to note that
>(i) I think TestGL should not consist of that many operational guidelines 
>(I realise there is a spillover from the old OpsGL, but I think they fit 
>better in QAH)

You should bring this up as an issue.  By my recollection, we (QAWG) 
actually decided on a specific set of items that were going into this section.

>(ii) I think QAH and TestGL editors need to commonly decide what gets put 
>in QAH. Maybe we can do this before the next publication cycle.

I thought we already did so.  (But don't have any minutes pointers handy 
right now.)

Other recollections?

Received on Monday, 7 June 2004 10:59:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:14:33 UTC