W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > April to June 2005

RE: Braille style sheets

From: Bailey, Bruce <Bruce.Bailey@ed.gov>
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 09:51:41 -0400
Message-ID: <CCDBDCBFA650F74AA88830D4BACDBAB50713007E@wdcrobe2m02.ed.gov>
To: "wai-ig list" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> 

>> There are another test and study about the browsers support in:
>> http://www.codestyle.org/css/media/embossed-BrowserSummary.shtml

> I am not certain then what is gained by an emboss media type.

I agree.  The table above makes it pretty clear that it is not doing anything for us yet!  I don't understand why separate TTY from dynamic Braille display, both are fixed pitch (grid), continuous, and interactive.  The best resource I have found indicates that the emboss media type confounds the distinction between Braille hard copy and dynamic Braille displays.

http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/media.html#media-groups
Received on Monday, 4 April 2005 13:51:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 20 September 2007 14:03:58 GMT