W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > October to December 2001

Re: MSN web site inaccessible to competing browsers

From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2001 17:01:55 -0800
Message-Id: <a05100301b8025a17cd10@[10.0.1.2]>
To: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
But were they right in theory if not practice?  The Web Standards
Project (www.webstandards.org) has this campaign to put something
on your web site telling people using "broken browsers" to upgrade
to something more standards compliant.  Is that the right approach
to take for accessibility's sake?

Should someone using a "broken" assistive technology program which
doesn't follow the standards closely enough be denied access?

--Kynn

http://www.webstandards.org/upgrade/what.html

-- 
Kynn Bartlett <kynn@reef.com>
Technical Developer Liaison
Reef North America
Accessibility - W3C - Integrator Network
________________________________________
BUSINESS IS DYNAMIC. TAKE CONTROL.
________________________________________
http://www.reef.com
Received on Sunday, 28 October 2001 20:16:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:13:58 GMT