W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > October to December 2001

Re: MSN web site inaccessible to competing browsers

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 15:05:31 -0500 (EST)
To: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
cc: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0110291502580.852-100000@tux.w3.org>
No, they should be given access to what they can get. And they should get a
message with it explaining why they are not getting good access.

Blocking access to information is generally a bad thing, as many users are
not in a position to upgrade every time an upgrade is avilable. Which does
not excuse them of the responsibility, nor their adminstrators of realising
that it is important.

Chaals


On Sun, 28 Oct 2001, Kynn Bartlett wrote:

  But were they right in theory if not practice?  The Web Standards
  Project (www.webstandards.org) has this campaign to put something
  on your web site telling people using "broken browsers" to upgrade
  to something more standards compliant.  Is that the right approach
  to take for accessibility's sake?

  Should someone using a "broken" assistive technology program which
  doesn't follow the standards closely enough be denied access?

  --Kynn

  http://www.webstandards.org/upgrade/what.html



-- 
Charles McCathieNevile    http://www.w3.org/People/Charles  phone: +61 409 134 136
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative     http://www.w3.org/WAI    fax: +1 617 258 5999
Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia
(or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
Received on Monday, 29 October 2001 15:05:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:13:58 GMT