W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > October to December 2001

RE: title for empty frames

From: Rebecca Cox <rebecca@cwa.co.nz>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 14:18:32 +1300
Message-Id: <v04210104b8025e2a28c7@[]>
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Thanks. One more question:

Does it matter if the name and title attribute are different?  The 
names in the code are not very informative and I would like to put in 
title attribs that will explain things a bit more.


At 6:54 PM -0600 10/28/01, Jim Thatcher wrote:
>On all frames I would use both title and name attribute. Also titles on the
>frame pages. This is because currently a preponderance of assistive
>technology is either using name or title on pages and NOT using the title
>That said, even an empty frame will appear in frame lists, so put the
>informative name="EmptyFrame" title="Empty Frame" for that one.
>Accessibility Consulting
>-----Original Message-----
>From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org]On
>Behalf Of Rebecca Cox
>Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2001 3:57 PM
>To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
>Subject: title for empty frames
>I'm fixing up frame title tags on an existing page. There seems to be
>at least one frame in the page which is empty - sort of like a spacer
>image. (I didn't make the page, I'm just trying to fix it up a bit,
>so no rude comments please!)
>Would it be best to treat this like a spacer image and give it
><frame src="nocontent.html" title="">
>??   Suggestions would be most welcome.
Received on Sunday, 28 October 2001 20:36:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:15 UTC