W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > August 2002

Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-08-25

From: <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 16:41:51 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <4875224.1030030834940.JavaMail.bwm@MCBRIDE-B-4>
To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

Time:
10:00:00 Fri Aug 25 2002 in America/New York

which is equivalent to
15:00:00 Fri Aug 25 2002 in Europe/London

Phone: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim)#7332
irc: irc.w3.org #rdfcore

1: Scribes
This weeks volunteer scribe is Eric Miller
Volunteer to scribe next week


2: Roll Call


3: Review Agenda


4: Next telecon 30th Aug 2002


5: Minutes of 2002-08-09 telecon

See:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Aug/0152.html


6: Status of minutes of 2002-08-16 telecon

See:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Aug/0171.html


7: Confirm Status of Completed Actions

ACTION: 2002-06-18#3 daveB
Fold Jeremy's text describing the graph syntax into the syntax document

see:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Aug/0067.html

ACTION: 2002-07-19#1 eric
investigate why JanGgets dropped on rdf-comments (twice now)

ACTION: 2002-08-16#2 bwm
to ask Semantic Web Coordination group to clarify priority of dark triples

see:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Aug/0168.html

ACTION: 2002-08-16#4 PatrickS
Circulate URI of latest datatypes document

see:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Aug/0158.html

ACTION: 2002-08-16#6 bwm
Summarise responses to datatypes question to community

see:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Aug/0163.html



8: Confirm Status of Withdrawn Actions

ACTION: 2002-06-17#8 guha
define the dark/light function for URIREFs

ACTION: 2002-06-17#9  patH
update the model theory to make statements with dark properties have no semantics

ACTION: 2002-06-17#10 guha
consider impact of dark triples on test cases

ACTION: 2002-06-17#12 patH
propose a paragraph on dark triples for the primer

ACTION: 2002-06-17#13  daveB
ensure that the description of the graph syntax adequately describes darkness



9: Status of new Concepts and Abstract Data Model WD
2002-08-16#3  EricM  publish rdf concepts and abstract data model WD


See:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Aug/0067.html


10: Relationship between XML Schema and RDF
Specifically, suggestion to ignore attributes from the xml:schema
namespace to allow processing by both xml schema processors and rdf
processors.
             

See:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Aug/0165.html


11: rdf:Alt's relationship to individual statements
They should be using repeated properties, not Alt, right?
Each spec in its own way should help answer this problem.


See:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Aug/0157.html


12: rdfms:assertion
I could find no record of us formally closing this issue.  Therefore:

Propose the text in section 2.3.2 of the Concepts and Abstract Data Model document resolves this issue and it be closed.


See:
  http://www.ninebynine.org/wip/RDF-basics/2002-08-05/Overview.htm#section-Social


13: Meaning of rdf:type and relationship between RDF and RDFS
(a) must any RDF processor understand the object of an rdf:type property as being an rdfs:Class (and hence understand what an rdfs:Class is)?

(b) must an RDF processor that understands what an rdfs:Class is also
understand the rest of the RDFS vocabulary?
  

See:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Aug/0173.html


14: Datatypes
Summary of after hours discussion last week
Progress on datatypes WD
Uses cases - DC, CC/PP, others?



------------------------------------------------------------
This agenda was produced by Jema, the Jena WG assistant
Received on Thursday, 22 August 2002 11:42:06 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:50:27 EDT