W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > January to March 2010

Re: Proposed W3C Spec Conventions

From: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:51:00 +0100
Cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, Spec Prod <spec-prod@w3.org>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Geoffrey Sneddon <gsneddon@opera.com>
Message-Id: <BF445248-E79D-4672-BBAA-2FE2F3FE4D8C@berjon.com>
To: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
On Feb 17, 2010, at 20:07 , Doug Schepers wrote:
> Now that we have people talking about it, let's decide what changes would need to be made, to either the spec-conventions doc, to ReSpec, or to CSS pre-processor / Anolis.

FWIW ReSpec uses conventions very similar to those of CSS PP and Anolis at least for <dfn> and its title, and I pilfered the ID generator from Anolis for linking to sections so it should be relatively straightforward. There are (I think) differences for IDs of interface elements but we can work that out. The biggest difference is that autogenerated links to <dfn> use <a> without @href in ReSpec and <span> in Anolis (the former is more correct semantically, but really it's mostly because it's shorter to type :).

-- 
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/
Received on Thursday, 18 February 2010 10:51:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 10 March 2012 06:19:16 GMT