W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > July 2007

Re: p:map

From: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 09:29:15 -0700
Message-ID: <28d56ece0707180929g1f07f1cctc9cec0f709786c44@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org

On 7/18/07, Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think we should at least say that the resolution of name would be
> consistent through all the pipeline (I say the resolution, not the
> result of the get)

How can we govern what happens inside a custom step ?

> That means :
> If I have a "toto.xml" in the xinclude and a "toto.xml" in the in a
> p:document and a "toto.xml" in the doc() function of my xslt what can
> I expect ?

That's why I had an "xinclude from sequence" step in our library.  We removed
that awhile ago.

--Alex Milowski
"The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the
inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language

Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics
Received on Wednesday, 18 July 2007 16:29:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:32:43 UTC