W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > July 2007

Re: p:map

From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 18:22:14 +0200
Message-ID: <546c6c1c0707180922nf929b4fn465a857fe8cdb3e0@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Alex Milowski" <alex@milowski.org>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org

I think we should at least say that the resolution of name would be
consistent through all the pipeline (I say the resolution, not the
result of the get)

That means :

If I have a "toto.xml" in the xinclude and a "toto.xml" in the in a
p:document and a "toto.xml" in the doc() function of my xslt what can
I expect ?

> Is there a basic use case that you want to see covered?  Maybe we can step
> back a bit and see if there is something we do need to do in V1.


Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 9 52 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 
Received on Wednesday, 18 July 2007 16:22:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:32:43 UTC