W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webcgm-wg@w3.org > September 2006

Re: Fwd: [Agenda] WebCGM telecon: Thursday, 28 September 2006

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:33:32 -0600
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20060928102827.048f3ec0@localhost>
To: Kentarou Fukuda <KENTAROU@jp.ibm.com>
Cc: Al Gilman <Alfred.S.Gilman@ieee.org>,Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>, WebCGM WG <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>

Hi Kentarou,

Thanks again for your input.  In fact, during telecon discussion, we 
decided to change it to "viewers"  :)

Hearing Al's explanation for that, I agreed (as did everyone else).

Two small edits were performed, per telecon decisions, and the final 
version, ready for integration into PR spec, is here now:

http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2006/wai-appendix-V3.html

-Lofton.


At 12:58 AM 9/29/2006 +0900, Kentarou Fukuda wrote:

>Hi Lofton,
>
> > We will take a look at this.  In the particular case of E.4, I actually
> > changed "viewers" in an earlier draft to "implementations", because I
> > realized that the suggestions would require the cooperation of authoring
>
> > tools as well.
> >
> > This also may apply to some other "viewers" occurrences.  We'll have a
>look.
>
>I agree with your direction. "implementations" is better.
>
>Best regards,
>---
>Kentarou Fukuda, Ph.D.
>Tokyo Research Laboratory, IBM Japan
>Tel: +81-46-215-4659
>E-mail: kentarou@jp.ibm.com
>
>Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com> wrote on 2006/09/28 23:28:43:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks for your contributions.  One comment on your latest suggestion...
> >
> > At 10:48 PM 9/28/2006 +0900, Kentarou Fukuda wrote:
> > >Hi,
> > >
> > >I'm sorry I couldn't attend the meeting today, but I have one small
> > >editorial suggestion.
> > >
> > >The word "implementations" is used in E.4. But in other parts, "viewer"
>is
> > >used for WebCGM implementations.
> > >I think it will be better that we select one from them.
> >
> > We will take a look at this.  In the particular case of E.4, I actually
> > changed "viewers" in an earlier draft to "implementations", because I
> > realized that the suggestions would require the cooperation of authoring
>
> > tools as well.
> >
> > This also may apply to some other "viewers" occurrences.  We'll have a
>look.
> >
> > Best,
> > -Lofton.
> >
> >
> > >Thank you very much for your efforts for the appendix.
> > >
> > >Best regards,
> > >---
> > >Kentarou Fukuda, Ph.D.
> > >Tokyo Research Laboratory, IBM Japan
> > >Tel: +81-46-215-4659
> > >E-mail: kentarou@jp.ibm.com
> > >
> > >Al Gilman <Alfred.S.Gilman@ieee.org> wrote on 2006/09/28 04:03:30:
> > >
> > > > At 11:44 AM -0600 9/27/06, Lofton Henderson wrote:
> > > > >Hi Al,
> > > > >
> > > > >Here is our agenda for Thursday.  Please let us know if you think
> > > > >you need to attend or not.  As I noted before the "Agenda", you
>(WAI
> > > > >PF) endorsed the appendix content preceding the addition of the new
> > > > >Styling section, so this would seem to be a matter of whether
>you're
> > > > >happy with the Styling addition.
> > > > >
> > > > >Attendance is welcome of course, but probably not needed if you are
> > > > >satisfied with the appendix now.
> > > >
> > > > I will plan to attend.  Hopefully this agenda item will be limited
>to
> > > > mutual congratulations and thanks.
> > > > But I'll plan to be there just in case any new ideas come in.
> > > >
> > > > I have already given my
> > > >
> > > > - endorsement in substance
> > > > http://www.w3.org/mid/p0611040ec1406cde468e@%5B10.0.1.3%5D
> > > >
> > > > - cavil in detail
> > > >
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2006Sep/0097.html
> > > >
> > > > I don't think that Kentarou can be there but I want to thank him for
> > > > what he contributed
> > > > without which we wouldn't have got here.
> > > >
> > > > Al
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >Cheers,
> > > > >-Lofton.
> > > > >
> > > > >>Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 11:09:39 -0600
> > > > >>To: WebCGM WG <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
> > > > >>From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
> > > > >>Subject: [Agenda] WebCGM telecon:  Thursday, 28 September 2006
> > > > >>[...]
> > > > >>
> > > > >>Dear friends of WebCGM WG,
> > > > >>
> > > > >>This is the regular weekly WG teleconference. If you can't attend,
> > > > >>please reply (to list) with "regrets":
> > > > >>
> > > > >>WebCGM, Thursday, 28 September 2006, 11:00am-12:30pm ET
> > > > >>(logistics below, following agenda)
> > > > >>
> > > > >>[Note.  The WAI PF folks may join us.  If they are happy with
>App.E
> > > > >>([2]) now, it is probably not necessary.  Per [6], this would
> > > > >>depend on whether WAI endorse the brief new "Styling" section, E.4
> > > > >>.]
> > > > >>
> > > > >>Agenda
> > > > >>=====
> > > > >>
> > > > >>Previous minutes:
> > > >
> >>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2006Sep/0045.html
> > > > >>
> > > > >>Scribe:  Dave
> > > > >>(See:
> > > > >>[0]
> > >http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/Group/scribing-guidelines.html )
> > > > >>
> > > > >>1.) roll call 11:00am ET, membership, agenda
> > > > >>         - WAI PF may attend, as needed
> > > > >>
> > > > >>2.) routine WG business
> > > > >>         - any?
> > > > >>
> > > > >>3.) should WG reply to CDF?  [7]
> > > > >>
> > > > >>4.) WAI appendix
> > > > >>         - consensus version of new "Styling" section [1]
> > > > >>         - references for PR text? [1]
> > > > >>         - WebCGM proposed final text for appendix [2]
> > > > >>         - WAI endorse [2] now, w/ styling add'n? (see also [6])
> > > > >>         - WG vote to approve [2] for PR text
> > > > >>
> > > > >>5.) During CR & moving to PR
> > > > >>         - the patent exclusion brohaha [9]
> > > > >>         - implementations & TS (features at risk) [8]
> > > > >>         - preliminary implementation report [3]
> > > > >>         - publish TS -- when to do it?
> > > > >>         - looking forward after 10/6: steps for PR transition [4]
> > > > >>         - post-PR-transition:  OASIS lock-step coordination
> > > > >>
> > > > >>6.) Press Release and Testimonials [5]
> > > > >>         - WG Members to Provide Testimonials for REC version
> > > > >>         - Draft Press Release by Web CGM WG
> > > > >>
> > > > >>7.) Others ?
> > > > >>
> > > > >>Logistics
> > > > >>----------
> > > > >>Zakim bridge +1 617-761-6200 (US) or +33.4.89.06.34.99 (France)
> > > > >>code: 932246 ("WEBCGM")
> > > > >>IRC, channel #webcgm
> > > > >>
> > > > >>http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/Group/Overview.html
> > > > >>
> > > > >>Regards,
> > > > >>Thierry
> > > > >>
> > > > >>[1]
> > >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2006Sep/0091.html
> > > > >>[2] http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2006/wai-appendix-V3.html
> > > > >>[3]
>http://www.w3.org/2006/Graphics/WebCGM/implementation-report.html
> > > > >>[4] http://www.w3.org/2005/08/transition?docstatus=pr-tr
> > > > >>[5]
> > >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2006Sep/0054.html
> > > > >>[6]
> > >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2006Sep/0055.html
> > > > >>[7]
> > >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2006Sep/0071.html
> > > > >>[8]
> > >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2006Sep/0080.html
> > > > >>
> > > > >>[9a]
> > >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2006Sep/0090.html
> > > > >>[9b] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/39256/webcgm2006/
> > > >
> >
> >
Received on Thursday, 28 September 2006 16:34:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:19:09 GMT