- From: Frederick Hirsch <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 07:59:39 -0400
- To: "marcosc@opera.com" <marcosc@opera.com>
- Cc: Frederick Hirsch <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, "Priestley, Mark, VF-Group" <Mark.Priestley@vodafone.com>, WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
I already made this change :) to widget user agent. I think that should work... On Mar 17, 2009, at 6:28 AM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote: > On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Priestley, Mark, VF-Group > <Mark.Priestley@vodafone.com> wrote: >> --------------------------- >> Editorial comments >> --------------------------- >> >> General Terminology >> >> "Widget agent", "widget platform", "application"? -> "widget user >> agent"? > > Lets just use "user agent". I don't think we should have a notion of a > "widget user agent". A user agent is one that attempts to implement > the said specification; that is, one that only implements signatures. > It should be possible to build a user agent that only processes > signatures and is unaware any other of the widget 1.0 specifications. > > >> [Comment] by "application" do you mean "widget user agent"? > > as above. > > -- > Marcos Caceres > http://datadriven.com.au regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch Nokia
Received on Tuesday, 17 March 2009 12:11:04 UTC