W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2008

Re: Next steps on Widgets testing?

From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 00:29:42 +0100
To: "Dominique Hazael-Massieux" <dom@w3.org>, "Arthur Barstow" <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Cc: public-webapps@w3.org, public-mwts@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.uk67jsaswxe0ny@widsith>

On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 15:05:23 +0100, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>  

> Hi Art, Charles,
> As was discussed during the WebApps WG F2F in Cannes, the Mobile Web
> Test Suites Working Group (and in particular, Kai Hendry) has started to
> work on developing test cases for the Widgets Packaging and
> Configuration specification:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2008OctDec/0235.html
> There are already quite a number of test cases available there (~50),
> that target well-defined part of the specifications.
> Could you let our group know whether you think this is going in the
> right direction, and what the next steps should be on our side?

Luckily, the co-chair of the group is at Opera, so can watch both the test  
development and can look inside Opera for anything we should be  
contributing :)

> Also, would it be helpful if the tests were moved to the public CVS
> server? should they sit in 2006/waf/widgets/tests/ if so?

I think it's better to have tests in CVS than to have them listed in an  
attachment in a mail archive. I am not fussed about where they go, but  
your suggestion seems as good as any. I presume that the groups will at  
some point go through the tests and decide whether they are happy with  
them all...



Charles McCathieNevile  Opera Software, Standards Group
     je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals       Try Opera: http://www.opera.com
Received on Tuesday, 25 November 2008 23:30:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 27 October 2017 07:26:12 UTC