public-soap-jms@w3.org from March 2010 by author

Amelia A Lewis

• Re: ISSUE-30: The URI is not explicitly mentioned in the precedence rules for WSDL 2.0 [SOAP-JMS Binding specification] (Tuesday, 2 March)

Eric Johnson

• Re: Agenda for 2010-03-30 conference call (Monday, 29 March)
• Agenda for 2010-03-30 conference call (Monday, 29 March)
• Operating JMS in the cloud - ACTION-153 (Monday, 29 March)
• ACTION-152 - mooted already (Monday, 29 March)
• Updated proposal for ISSUE-31, my ACTION-156 (Thursday, 18 March)
• Re: Agenda for 2010-03-16 conference call (Tuesday, 16 March)
• Agenda for 2010-03-16 conference call (Tuesday, 16 March)
• Re: ISSUE-32 (Protocol-2015 too vague): Protocol-2015 too vaguely worded, probably unnecessary [SOAP-JMS Binding specification] (Monday, 15 March)
• Moving to PR - what will it take? (Monday, 15 March)
• Re: ACTION-149 - updated test cases (Monday, 15 March)
• Re: Action-143: updates completed as per suggestion of Phil (Monday, 15 March)
• Re: Action-143: updates completed as per suggestion of Phil (Monday, 15 March)
• Agenda for 2010-03-09 conference call (Monday, 8 March)
• Fwd: Daylight Saving Time start for 2010 (Monday, 8 March)
• ACTION-145 - Changes to test cases from review (Tuesday, 2 March)
• ACTION-142 - updated test cases (Monday, 1 March)
• Agenda for 2010-03-02 conference call (Monday, 1 March)

Mark Phillips

• Minutes 2010-03-30 (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Applied resolution for ACTION-147 / ISSUE-28 (Monday, 22 March)
• Minutes 2010-03-16 (Tuesday, 16 March)
• Regrets for (Tuesday, 9 March)
• Minutes 2010-03-02 (Tuesday, 2 March)

Peter Easton

• Agenda for 2010-03-09 conference call (Tuesday, 9 March)
• RE: Agenda for 2010-02-23 conference call (Tuesday, 9 March)

Phil Adams

• regrets for tomorrow's call (Tuesday, 2 March)
• Action-144: review complete (Tuesday, 2 March)
• Re: ACTION-142 - updated test cases (Tuesday, 2 March)

SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group Issue Tracker

• ISSUE-33: Assertion 'Protocol-2014' is probably unnecessary [SOAP-JMS Binding specification] (Tuesday, 30 March)
• ISSUE-32 (Protocol-2015 too vague): Protocol-2015 too vaguely worded, probably unnecessary [SOAP-JMS Binding specification] (Monday, 15 March)
• ISSUE-31: soapjms:isFault typing is ambiguous and its value is weakened because it is an optional property (Tuesday, 2 March)
• ISSUE-30: The URI is not explicitly mentioned in the precedence rules for WSDL 2.0 [SOAP-JMS Binding specification] (Tuesday, 2 March)

Last message date: Wednesday, 31 March 2010 09:26:51 UTC