W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-soap-jms@w3.org > March 2010

Re: ACTION-142 - updated test cases

From: Phil Adams <phil_adams@us.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 18:38:50 -0600
To: Eric Johnson <eric@tibco.com>
Cc: SOAP-JMS <public-soap-jms@w3.org>, public-soap-jms-request@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF75946F70.2C8FC620-ON862576DA.0003768C-862576DA.00038E95@us.ibm.com>
Eric,
I think the information in the "Message Flows" section of each of those 
testcases needs to be updated as well.   They both still refer to the 
"old" replyToName value.

Phil



From:
Eric Johnson <eric@tibco.com>
To:
SOAP-JMS <public-soap-jms@w3.org>
Date:
03/01/2010 05:56 PM
Subject:
ACTION-142 - updated test cases
Sent by:
public-soap-jms-request@w3.org



As per http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/142

I've updated:
http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/testcases/testcases/testcases.html#test0006

and
http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/testcases/testcases/testcases.html#test0007


by removing the replyToName from the binding elements.  In the case of
test0006, I updated "GoodReplyQueue" to "AReplyQueue".  In the case of
test0007, I added an identical entry to the updated test0006.

http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2008/ws/soapjms/testcases/testcases/testcases.html.diff?f=h&r1=text&tr1=1.16&r2=text&tr2=1.15&f=h


-Eric.
Received on Tuesday, 2 March 2010 00:39:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 18 December 2010 18:16:23 GMT