public-sml@w3.org from March 2008 by author

bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

• [Bug 5530] Use consistent form for MIT URI (Friday, 14 March)
• [Bug 5518] Why are rules allowed on both element declaration and type definitions (Thursday, 13 March)
• [Bug 5542] How are SML URIs absolutized (Thursday, 13 March)
• [Bug 5522] The term "containing element" is not clear (Thursday, 13 March)
• [Bug 5530] Use consistent form for MIT URI (Thursday, 13 March)
• [Bug 5532] The previous-draft links are out of date (Thursday, 13 March)
• [Bug 5529] Calrify Appendix C (Thursday, 13 March)
• [Bug 5528] xs:import for SML namespace is unnecessary (Thursday, 13 March)
• [Bug 5283] "interchange set" or "interchange model" (Thursday, 13 March)
• [Bug 5564] recursive definition of DerefExpr should be restored (Thursday, 13 March)
• [Bug 5558] Definition & use of word Document (Thursday, 13 March)
• [Bug 5558] Definition & use of word Document (Thursday, 13 March)
• [Bug 5564] recursive definition of DerefExpr should be restored (Thursday, 13 March)
• [Bug 5564] recursive definition of DerefExpr should be restored (Thursday, 13 March)
• [Bug 5562] SML should define an XHTML href Reference Scheme (Wednesday, 12 March)
• [Bug 5561] SML should define a Simple XLink Reference Scheme (Wednesday, 12 March)
• [Bug 5513] Why does SML define sml:ref instead of using XLink (Wednesday, 12 March)
• [Bug 5513] Why does SML define sml:ref instead of using XLink (Wednesday, 12 March)
• [Bug 5513] Why does SML define sml:ref instead of using XLink (Wednesday, 12 March)
• [Bug 5513] Why does SML define sml:ref instead of using XLink (Wednesday, 12 March)
• [Bug 5558] Definition & use of word Document (Monday, 10 March)
• [Bug 5523] Discuss the behavior of GET on URI (Friday, 7 March)
• [Bug 5523] Discuss the behavior of GET on URI (Friday, 7 March)
• [Bug 5546] Reconcile SML-IF with RFC 2557 (Friday, 7 March)
• [Bug 5545] Reconcile SML URIs with RFC3986 (Friday, 7 March)
• [Bug 5544] Why does SML require that the target of SMLURI be an XML element? (Friday, 7 March)
• [Bug 5543] SML URI seems overconstrained (Friday, 7 March)
• [Bug 5542] How are SML URIs absolutized (Friday, 7 March)
• [Bug 5541] Why is schema-less identification of reference elements important? (Friday, 7 March)
• [Bug 5513] Why does SML define sml:ref instead of using XLink (Friday, 7 March)
• [Bug 5501] LC publication related editorial fixes (Thursday, 6 March)
• [Bug 5526] What does "nested to any depth" mean? (Thursday, 6 March)
• [Bug 5525] Confusing section names (Thursday, 6 March)
• [Bug 5524] Rename section 4.4.1.1 (Thursday, 6 March)
• [Bug 5298] Consider using another term for 'URI scheme' (Thursday, 6 March)
• [Bug 5521] The term "URI scheme" is confusing (Thursday, 6 March)
• [Bug 5506] Link name for 5.5 Schema Document Bindings (Thursday, 6 March)
• [Bug 5505] wrong type for schemaBinding/namespaceBinding/namespace attribute (Thursday, 6 March)
• [Bug 5523] Discuss the behavior of GET on URI (Thursday, 6 March)
• [Bug 5521] The term "URI scheme" is confusing (Thursday, 6 March)
• [Bug 5513] Why does SML define sml:ref instead of using XLink (Thursday, 6 March)
• [Bug 5525] Confusing section names (Thursday, 6 March)
• [Bug 5526] What does "nested to any depth" mean? (Thursday, 6 March)
• [Bug 5527] Why is NCName optional? (Thursday, 6 March)
• [Bug 5528] xs:import for SML namespace is unnecessary (Thursday, 6 March)
• [Bug 5529] Calrify Appendix C (Thursday, 6 March)
• [Bug 5530] Use consistent form for MIT URI (Thursday, 6 March)
• [Bug 5532] The previous-draft links are out of date (Tuesday, 4 March)
• [Bug 5530] Use consistent form for MIT URI (Tuesday, 4 March)
• [Bug 5529] Calrify Appendix C (Tuesday, 4 March)
• [Bug 5528] xs:import for SML namespace is unnecessary (Tuesday, 4 March)
• [Bug 5527] Why is NCName optional? (Tuesday, 4 March)
• [Bug 5526] What does "nested to any depth" mean? (Tuesday, 4 March)
• [Bug 5525] Confusing section names (Tuesday, 4 March)
• [Bug 5524] Rename section 4.4.1.1 (Tuesday, 4 March)
• [Bug 5523] Discuss the behavior of GET on URI (Tuesday, 4 March)
• [Bug 5522] The term "containing element" is not clear (Tuesday, 4 March)
• [Bug 5521] The term "URI scheme" is confusing (Tuesday, 4 March)
• [Bug 5520] Why is document defined as a character sequence? (Tuesday, 4 March)
• [Bug 5519] Relationship between SML model validity and XSD validity assessment needs to be precisely defined (Tuesday, 4 March)
• [Bug 5518] Why are rules allowed on both element declaration and type definitions (Tuesday, 4 March)

John Arwe

• [w3c sml][agenda] 2008-03-31 to 2008-04-02 SML F2F (Tuesday, 25 March)
• [w3c sml][agenda] 2008-03-20 SML (Wednesday, 19 March)
• SML References (Tuesday, 18 March)

Jordan Boucher

• [w3c sml][minutes] 2008-03-06 SML Telecon (Saturday, 8 March)

Kumar Pandit

• RE: New Xpointer scheme proposed: smlxpath1 (Friday, 7 March)

Philippe Le Hegaret

• RE: New Xpointer scheme proposed: smlxpath1 (Tuesday, 4 March)

Pratul Dublish

• [w3c sml][agenda] 2008-03-27 SML Telecon (Tuesday, 25 March)
• [w3c sml][agenda] 2008-03-13 SML Telecon (Monday, 10 March)
• Re: EPR TAG NOTE (Saturday, 8 March)
• [w3c sml][agenda] [v2] 2008-03-06 SML Telecon (Thursday, 6 March)
• [w3c sml][agenda] 2008-03-06 SML Telecon (Tuesday, 4 March)
• W3C SML and SML-IF 1.1 - Last Call for Review and Comments (Monday, 3 March)

Sandy Gao

• [w3c sml][minutes] 2008-03-013 SML Telecon (Monday, 17 March)
• [w3c sml][minutes] 2008-01-21 SML F2F (Tuesday, 4 March)

Smith, Virginia (HP Software)

• RE: Draft proposal fro EPR Note: Issue 5341 (Tuesday, 18 March)
• RE: Re: EPR TAG NOTE (Friday, 14 March)
• RE: SML EPR Reference Scheme Note (Friday, 14 March)

Wilson, Kirk D

• [w3c sml] [minutes] 2008-03-20 Teleconference minutes (Friday, 21 March)
• Cleaned-up version of the EPR Scheme Note (Wednesday, 19 March)
• RE: Draft proposal fro EPR Note: Issue 5341 (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Draft proposal fro EPR Note: Issue 5341 (Tuesday, 18 March)
• RE: SML EPR Reference Scheme Note (Saturday, 15 March)
• EPR TAG NOTE (Thursday, 6 March)
• SML EPR Reference Scheme Note (Thursday, 6 March)

Last message date: Tuesday, 25 March 2008 17:06:12 UTC