W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sml@w3.org > March 2008

[Bug 5527] Why is NCName optional?

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 16:53:42 +0000
CC:
To: public-sml@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1JWaOc-0001WG-Lu@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5527

           Summary: Why is NCName optional?
           Product: SML
           Version: LC
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: Windows NT
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: Core
        AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org
        ReportedBy: pratul.dublish@microsoft.com
         QAContact: public-sml@w3.org


Minor comment from
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2008Mar/0001.html 

4.5.1.2: Since XML Schema uses XPath 1.0 rules for names, surely the
NCName: isn't optional, it _must_ be present, and in any case, it
should be stated that there must be an NS Binding for that prefix to
the SML namespace in scope.
Received on Tuesday, 4 March 2008 16:53:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 4 March 2008 16:53:53 GMT