W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sml@w3.org > March 2008

[Bug 5521] The term "URI scheme" is confusing

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2008 17:24:08 +0000
CC:
To: public-sml@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1JXJpA-0002CM-Cr@wiggum.w3.org>


http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5521





------- Comment #1 from pratul.dublish@microsoft.com  2008-03-06 17:24 -------
I believe that this was fixed in the LC draft by using the term "SML URI
Reference Scheme"

Received on Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:24:19 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org: "[Bug 5523] Discuss the behavior of GET on URI"
Previous message: bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org: "[Bug 5513] Why does SML define sml:ref instead of using XLink"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:24:19 GMT