public-sdw-comments@w3.org from April 2017 by author

Bart van Leeuwen

• RE: Time Ontology: Smallest possible increment-of-time (Monday, 17 April)
• Re: FW: Time Ontology: Smallest possible increment-of-time (Thursday, 13 April)
• Re: Time Ontology: Smallest possible increment-of-time (Monday, 10 April)

C. M. Sperberg-McQueen

• Re: question about 6 April 2017 draft of "Time Ontology in OWL" (Friday, 21 April)
• question about 6 April 2017 draft of "Time Ontology in OWL" (Friday, 7 April)

Catherine Roussey

• SOSA ontology (Tuesday, 25 April)

Christoph, Pascal

• Re: Time Ontology: Smallest possible increment-of-time (Friday, 7 April)
• Time Ontology: Smallest possible increment-of-time (Friday, 7 April)

Ed Parsons

• Re: Exposing datasets with DCAT (partitioning, subsets..) (Wednesday, 5 April)
• Re: Geographic metadata in Spatial Data on the Web Best Practices (Tuesday, 4 April)
• Re: Geographic metadata in Spatial Data on the Web Best Practices (Tuesday, 4 April)
• Re: Geographic metadata in Spatial Data on the Web Best Practices (Tuesday, 4 April)
• Re: Exposing datasets with DCAT (partitioning, subsets..) (Tuesday, 4 April)
• Re: SDWBP comments (Tuesday, 4 April)
• Re: Spatial Data on the Web and SVG : Comments on Spatial Data on the Web Use Cases & Requirements (Tuesday, 4 April)

Jeremy Tandy

• Re: Delft glossary action: My failure (Friday, 21 April)
• Re: Some thoughts on http://www.w3.org/TR/sdw-bp/ (Monday, 10 April)
• Re: Some thoughts on http://www.w3.org/TR/sdw-bp/ (Thursday, 6 April)

Jon Blower

• Re: Exposing datasets with DCAT (partitioning, subsets..) (Wednesday, 5 April)

Joshua Lieberman

• Re: W3C Draft OWL-Time ontology for final review. (Wednesday, 12 April)

Le Phuoc, Danh

• Re: W3C Draft OWL-Time ontology for final review. (Thursday, 6 April)

Little, Chris

• RE: OWL Time Ontology update (Thursday, 13 April)
• RE: FW: Time Ontology: Smallest possible increment-of-time (Thursday, 13 April)
• RE: question about 6 April 2017 draft of "Time Ontology in OWL" (Wednesday, 12 April)
• FW: Time Ontology: Smallest possible increment-of-time (Wednesday, 12 April)
• RE: W3C Draft OWL-Time ontology for final review. (Wednesday, 12 April)
• W3C Draft OWL-Time ontology for final review. (Thursday, 6 April)

Martin Desruisseaux

• Re: Geographic metadata in Spatial Data on the Web Best Practices (Tuesday, 4 April)

Maxime Lefrançois

• Re: SOSA ontology (Tuesday, 25 April)

Neil McNaughton

• RE: Geographic metadata in Spatial Data on the Web Best Practices (Tuesday, 4 April)

p.barnaghi@surrey.ac.uk

• Fw: Wide review - help needed (Thursday, 13 April)

Peter Parslow

• Delft glossary action: My failure (Friday, 21 April)
• RE: Some thoughts on http://www.w3.org/TR/sdw-bp/ (Monday, 10 April)

Rob Atkinson

• Re: Exposing datasets with DCAT (partitioning, subsets..) (Tuesday, 4 April)

Sergio José Rodríguez Méndez

• Regarding "Actuation" and "Actuator" conceptual models for IoT and its mapping to SOSA (Sunday, 30 April)

Simon.Cox@csiro.au

• RE: question about 6 April 2017 draft of "Time Ontology in OWL" (Friday, 21 April)
• RE: Time Ontology: Smallest possible increment-of-time (Monday, 17 April)
• RE: W3C Draft OWL-Time ontology for final review. (Monday, 17 April)

VAGLIANO IACOPO

• OWL Time Ontology update (Monday, 10 April)

Last message date: Sunday, 30 April 2017 16:20:25 UTC