W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > May 2012

Official Response to ISSUE-142 from RDF Web Apps WG

From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 13:20:32 -0400
Message-ID: <4FA2BE60.4060509@digitalbazaar.com>
To: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com>, Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>
CC: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Hi Alex, Liam,

Thank you for your feedback on the RDFa 1.1 documents. This is
an official response from the RDF Web Apps WG to your Candidate
Recommendation issue before we enter the Proposed Recommendation phase
for the RDFa 1.1 specifications.

Your issues were tracked here:

http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/142

Explanation of Issue
--------------------

There were three high-level editorial clarifications that you had requested:

Liam, you had wanted us to improve the prose in the RDFa Lite abstract.
Alex, you had wanted us to clarify how about="[]" should be processed as
well as how empty lists are generated via the RDFa processing rules.

Working Group Decision
----------------------

Liam, we made your changes here:

* Introductory text clarification on RDFa Lite

Editorial spec change:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2012May/0017.html

Alex, we made your changes here:

* Clarification on the meaning of @about="[]"

Editorial spec change:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2012May/0018.html

* Spelling out the case of empty list generation

Editorial spec change:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2012May/0019.html

The Working group discussed these changes here:

http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/meetings/2012-05-03#ISSUE__2d_142__3a__Minor_editorial_fixes_to_CR_document_before_transitioning_to_PR

and accepted them:

RESOLVED: Accept the editorial changes made to RDFa Core 1.1 and RDFa
Lite 1.1 addressing the comments raised in ISSUE-142.

Feedback
--------

Since this is an official Working Group response to your issue, and
since the group is under an extremely tight deadline, we would really
appreciate it if you responded immediately to this e-mail and let us
know if the findings and decision made by the group is acceptable to you
as soon as possible.

Liam, Alex, for the purposes of this particular issue, you have already
acknowledged that the changes to address the RDFa Lite abstract and the
list processing rules are okay. Alex, you have not acknowledged whether
or not the changes explaining about="[]" work for you. Please do so as
soon as possible.

-- manu

-- 
Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny)
President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
blog: PaySwarm Website for Developers Launched
http://digitalbazaar.com/2012/02/22/new-payswarm-alpha/
Received on Thursday, 3 May 2012 17:21:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 3 May 2012 17:21:08 GMT