W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > May 2012

Re: Official Response to ISSUE-142 from RDF Web Apps WG

From: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com>
Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 10:46:45 -0700
Message-ID: <CABp3FNJKA96MiRiBjah5bfT1zsPAMm+af6n=_MbeEdkn=ZD8PA@mail.gmail.com>
To: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Just to confirm again, I am fine with all these resolutions.

On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote:
> Hi Alex, Liam,
>
> Thank you for your feedback on the RDFa 1.1 documents. This is
> an official response from the RDF Web Apps WG to your Candidate
> Recommendation issue before we enter the Proposed Recommendation phase
> for the RDFa 1.1 specifications.
>
> Your issues were tracked here:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/142
>
> Explanation of Issue
> --------------------
>
> There were three high-level editorial clarifications that you had requested:
>
> Liam, you had wanted us to improve the prose in the RDFa Lite abstract.
> Alex, you had wanted us to clarify how about="[]" should be processed as
> well as how empty lists are generated via the RDFa processing rules.
>
> Working Group Decision
> ----------------------
>
> Liam, we made your changes here:
>
> * Introductory text clarification on RDFa Lite
>
> Editorial spec change:
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2012May/0017.html
>
> Alex, we made your changes here:
>
> * Clarification on the meaning of @about="[]"
>
> Editorial spec change:
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2012May/0018.html
>
> * Spelling out the case of empty list generation
>
> Editorial spec change:
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2012May/0019.html
>
> The Working group discussed these changes here:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/meetings/2012-05-03#ISSUE__2d_142__3a__Minor_editorial_fixes_to_CR_document_before_transitioning_to_PR
>
> and accepted them:
>
> RESOLVED: Accept the editorial changes made to RDFa Core 1.1 and RDFa
> Lite 1.1 addressing the comments raised in ISSUE-142.
>
> Feedback
> --------
>
> Since this is an official Working Group response to your issue, and
> since the group is under an extremely tight deadline, we would really
> appreciate it if you responded immediately to this e-mail and let us
> know if the findings and decision made by the group is acceptable to you
> as soon as possible.
>
> Liam, Alex, for the purposes of this particular issue, you have already
> acknowledged that the changes to address the RDFa Lite abstract and the
> list processing rules are okay. Alex, you have not acknowledged whether
> or not the changes explaining about="[]" work for you. Please do so as
> soon as possible.
>
> -- manu
>
> --
> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny)
> President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
> blog: PaySwarm Website for Developers Launched
> http://digitalbazaar.com/2012/02/22/new-payswarm-alpha/



-- 
--Alex Milowski
"The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the
inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language
considered."

Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics
Received on Thursday, 3 May 2012 17:47:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 3 May 2012 17:47:15 GMT