W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > May 2012

Re: Test 0218 : empty lists

From: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com>
Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 08:44:17 -0700
Message-ID: <CABp3FNJQqNixaEwKADFvUKbztm_hdxccSqY-1maoM_W_Qyyivw@mail.gmail.com>
To: W3C RDFWA WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 9:23 PM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote:
> On 05/01/2012 01:29 AM, Alex Milowski wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 8:35 PM, Gregg
>> Kellogg<gregg@greggkellogg.net>  wrote:
>>>
>>> This is implied in the previous step where it says "next item in
>>>
>>> the ‘bnode’ array or, if that does not exist,
>>> http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil". You're right that
>>>  it's not spelled out explicitly.
>>
>>
>> I'm not sure I agree.  I think the specification doesn't say that
>> and I don't see it being implied.  That was certainly not the reading
>> I took when I implemented it.
>
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> The RDFa Core spec editor and I discussed this and have made an
> editorial change that should make this much more clear. Please see the
> change here:
>
> https://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/sources/rdfa-core/#PS-Lists
>
> If you are happy with this change, please respond to this e-mail as soon
> as possible and let us know as we're under a very tight schedule for PR.
> We will have an official response to you after the telecon tomorrow, but
> the sooner you respond, the better. If you are not happy with the
> change, please let us know exactly why you are not and what change would
> result in a positive response from you.

Yes, this change is fine.  ...and I've implemented it as well.

-- 
--Alex Milowski
"The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the
inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language
considered."

Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics
Received on Thursday, 3 May 2012 15:44:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 3 May 2012 15:44:52 GMT