- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 00:16:06 -0400
- To: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com>
- CC: W3C RDFWA WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
On 04/30/2012 08:13 PM, Alex Milowski wrote: > B. if a resource is present identified by the resolved value of the > "about" attribute. > > For this test case to be correct, it must be (B). That is correct. Shane added some editorial text to Section 7.4 of RDFa Core 1.1 to clarify this case: """ NOTE: A related consequence of this is that when the value of an attribute of this datatype is an empty SafeCURIE (e.g., @about="[]"), that value does not result in an IRI and therefore the value is ignored. """ You can view the change here: https://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/sources/rdfa-core/#s_curieprocessing This means that out of these processing steps: * by using the resource from @about, if present, obtained according to the section on CURIE and IRI Processing; * otherwise, if the element is the root element of the document, then act as if there is an empty @about present, and process it according to the rule for @about, above; * otherwise, if parent object is present, new subject is set to the value of parent object. The first rule doesn't match because the CURIE [] does not result in an IRI, and thus the about="[]" is ignored, the second rule doesn't match because we're not on the root element, so the third rule matches. We will get an official response back to you by tomorrow after the telecon, however, if you're happy with this editorial change please respond to this e-mail and let us know as soon as possible as we're under a very tight deadline. If you are not happy with the change, please let us know exactly why. -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: PaySwarm Website for Developers Launched http://digitalbazaar.com/2012/02/22/new-payswarm-alpha/
Received on Thursday, 3 May 2012 04:16:37 UTC