- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2016 16:57:52 -0800
- To: Irene Polikoff <irene@topquadrant.com>
- Cc: "public-rdf-shapes@w3.org" <public-rdf-shapes@w3.org>
That is indeed what you said. Prohibiting the value of sh:targetNode from being a blank node says something about all RDF graphs. This is what the wording in the SHACL document is stating. peter On 12/03/2016 04:45 PM, Irene Polikoff wrote: > This is not what I said > >> On Dec 3, 2016, at 5:46 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> The SHACL spec can say something about all RDF graphs? That doesn't make sense. >> >> peter >> >> >> On 12/03/2016 02:44 PM, Irene Polikoff wrote: >>> By saying so in the spec. >>> >>>> On Dec 3, 2016, at 4:09 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com >>>> <mailto:pfpschneider@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>> >>>> But how can the value of sh:targetNode be prohibited from being a blank node? >>> >
Received on Sunday, 4 December 2016 00:58:40 UTC