public-rdf-shapes@w3.org from December 2016 by thread

Making SHACL Work For Industry Smith, Tim (Wednesday, 14 December)

on the turtle serialization of SHACL Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Tuesday, 13 December)

Don't let perfect be the enemy of the good Adam Kimball (Monday, 12 December)

The flexibility of SPARQL/SPIN in SHACL is needed Steve Ray (Tuesday, 13 December)

Fw: WG Outlook Arnaud Le Hors (Monday, 12 December)

The future of SHACL HODGES Jr, John (Monday, 12 December)

"RDF node" and "node" in SHACL document Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Sunday, 11 December)

difference between sh:hasValue and sh:in Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Sunday, 11 December)

Enough already Terry Roach (Saturday, 10 December)

on divergence between textual and SPARQL definitions Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Friday, 9 December)

on sh:resultPath Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Friday, 9 December)

on validation reports Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Sunday, 4 December)

more sloppiness in the SHACL document Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Sunday, 4 December)

on validation reports Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Saturday, 3 December)

on values Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Saturday, 3 December)

Re: a problem with shapes and constraints Dimitris Kontokostas (Thursday, 1 December)

Re: why retain sh:predicate in property constraints? Dimitris Kontokostas (Thursday, 1 December)

Last message date: Saturday, 17 December 2016 09:18:02 UTC