Re: on values from Irene Polikoff on 2016-12-04 (public-rdf-shapes@w3.org from December 2016)

From: Irene Polikoff <irene@topquadrant.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2016 19:45:24 -0500
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
Cc: "public-rdf-shapes@w3.org" <public-rdf-shapes@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1B0F39ED-B167-48FA-9EEB-D58AA34E0E36@topquadrant.com>

This is not what I said

> On Dec 3, 2016, at 5:46 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> The SHACL spec can say something about all RDF graphs?  That doesn't make sense.
> 
> peter
> 
> 
> On 12/03/2016 02:44 PM, Irene Polikoff wrote:
>> By saying so in the spec.
>> 
>>> On Dec 3, 2016, at 4:09 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com
>>> <mailto:pfpschneider@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> But how can the value of sh:targetNode be prohibited from being a blank node?
>>

Received on Sunday, 4 December 2016 00:46:03 UTC