public-rdf-shapes@w3.org from December 2016 by author

Adam Kimball

• Don't let perfect be the enemy of the good (Monday, 12 December)

Andy Seaborne

• SPARQL Maintenance (EXISTS) Community Group [Was: Enough already] (Sunday, 11 December)
• Re: on divergence between textual and SPARQL definitions (Friday, 9 December)
• Re: on divergence between textual and SPARQL definitions (Friday, 9 December)

Arnaud Le Hors

• Re: Why not adopt ShEx? (was Re: Enough already) (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: Why not adopt ShEx? (was Re: Enough already) (Monday, 12 December)
• Re: Why not adopt ShEx? (was Re: Enough already) (Monday, 12 December)
• Fw: WG Outlook (Monday, 12 December)
• Re: The future of SHACL (Monday, 12 December)
• Re: Enough already (Monday, 12 December)

Bart van Leeuwen

• Re: Enough already (Saturday, 10 December)

David Booth

• Re: on the turtle serialization of SHACL (Wednesday, 14 December)

David Price

• Re: on the turtle serialization of SHACL (Wednesday, 14 December)

Dean Allemang

• Re: Why not adopt ShEx? (was Re: Enough already) (Monday, 12 December)
• Re: Why not adopt ShEx? (was Re: Enough already) (Monday, 12 December)
• Re: Why not adopt ShEx? (was Re: Enough already) (Monday, 12 December)

Dimitris Kontokostas

• Re: difference between sh:hasValue and sh:in (Monday, 12 December)
• Re: on sh:resultPath (Monday, 12 December)
• Re: on divergence between textual and SPARQL definitions (Friday, 9 December)
• Re: on sh:resultPath (Friday, 9 December)
• Re: on values (Monday, 5 December)
• Re: a problem with shapes and constraints (Thursday, 1 December)
• Re: why retain sh:predicate in property constraints? (Thursday, 1 December)

Eric Prud'hommeaux

• Re: on the turtle serialization of SHACL (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: on the turtle serialization of SHACL (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: Why not adopt ShEx? (was Re: Enough already) (Monday, 12 December)

Gray, Alasdair J G

• Re: Why not adopt ShEx? (was Re: Enough already) (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Why not adopt ShEx? (was Re: Enough already) (Sunday, 11 December)

Gregg Kellogg

• Re: Why not adopt ShEx? (was Re: Enough already) (Monday, 12 December)

HODGES Jr, John

• The future of SHACL (Monday, 12 December)

Holger Knublauch

• Re: on the turtle serialization of SHACL (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: on the turtle serialization of SHACL (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: on the turtle serialization of SHACL (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: on the turtle serialization of SHACL (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: "RDF node" and "node" in SHACL document (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: Enough already (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: difference between sh:hasValue and sh:in (Monday, 12 December)
• Re: "RDF node" and "node" in SHACL document (Monday, 12 December)
• Re: on divergence between textual and SPARQL definitions (Monday, 12 December)
• Re: Why not adopt ShEx? (was Re: Enough already) (Monday, 12 December)
• Re: difference between sh:hasValue and sh:in (Monday, 12 December)
• Re: on divergence between textual and SPARQL definitions (Sunday, 11 December)
• Re: on sh:resultPath (Saturday, 10 December)
• Re: on divergence between textual and SPARQL definitions (Saturday, 10 December)
• Re: why retain sh:predicate in property constraints? (Friday, 9 December)
• Re: on sh:resultPath (Friday, 9 December)
• Re: on sh:resultPath (Friday, 9 December)
• Re: on sh:resultPath (Friday, 9 December)
• Re: on validation reports (Friday, 9 December)
• Re: more sloppiness in the SHACL document (Tuesday, 6 December)
• Re: on validation reports (Tuesday, 6 December)
• Re: more sloppiness in the SHACL document (Tuesday, 6 December)
• Re: more sloppiness in the SHACL document (Tuesday, 6 December)
• Re: why retain sh:predicate in property constraints? (Thursday, 1 December)

Irene Polikoff

• Re: on the turtle serialization of SHACL (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: Why not adopt ShEx? (was Re: Enough already) (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: more sloppiness in the SHACL document (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: Enough already (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: Enough already (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: Why not adopt ShEx? (was Re: Enough already) (Monday, 12 December)
• Re: on validation reports (Friday, 9 December)
• Re: on values (Tuesday, 6 December)
• Re: on values (Monday, 5 December)
• Re: on values (Sunday, 4 December)
• Re: on values (Sunday, 4 December)
• Re: on values (Saturday, 3 December)
• Re: on values (Saturday, 3 December)
• Re: on values (Saturday, 3 December)
• Re: on values (Saturday, 3 December)

Jeremy J Carroll

• Re: on the turtle serialization of SHACL (Thursday, 15 December)

Karen Coyle

• Re: more sloppiness in the SHACL document (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: Enough already (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: Why not adopt ShEx? (was Re: Enough already) (Monday, 12 December)
• Re: "RDF node" and "node" in SHACL document (Monday, 12 December)
• Re: Enough already (Saturday, 10 December)

Martynas Jusevičius

• Re: Why not adopt ShEx? (was Re: Enough already) (Sunday, 11 December)
• Re: Enough already (Saturday, 10 December)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

• Re: on the turtle serialization of SHACL (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: on the turtle serialization of SHACL (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: on the turtle serialization of SHACL (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: on the turtle serialization of SHACL (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: on the turtle serialization of SHACL (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: on the turtle serialization of SHACL (Wednesday, 14 December)
• on the turtle serialization of SHACL (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: more sloppiness in the SHACL document (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: more sloppiness in the SHACL document (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: difference between sh:hasValue and sh:in (Monday, 12 December)
• Re: on sh:resultPath (Monday, 12 December)
• Re: "RDF node" and "node" in SHACL document (Monday, 12 December)
• Re: on divergence between textual and SPARQL definitions (Monday, 12 December)
• Re: "RDF node" and "node" in SHACL document (Monday, 12 December)
• Re: on divergence between textual and SPARQL definitions (Monday, 12 December)
• "RDF node" and "node" in SHACL document (Sunday, 11 December)
• difference between sh:hasValue and sh:in (Sunday, 11 December)
• Re: on divergence between textual and SPARQL definitions (Sunday, 11 December)
• Re: on sh:resultPath (Saturday, 10 December)
• Re: Enough already (Saturday, 10 December)
• Re: on divergence between textual and SPARQL definitions (Friday, 9 December)
• Re: on divergence between textual and SPARQL definitions (Friday, 9 December)
• Re: on sh:resultPath (Friday, 9 December)
• Re: on divergence between textual and SPARQL definitions (Friday, 9 December)
• Re: on divergence between textual and SPARQL definitions (Friday, 9 December)
• on divergence between textual and SPARQL definitions (Friday, 9 December)
• on sh:resultPath (Friday, 9 December)
• Re: on validation reports (Thursday, 8 December)
• Re: more sloppiness in the SHACL document (Tuesday, 6 December)
• Re: more sloppiness in the SHACL document (Tuesday, 6 December)
• Re: more sloppiness in the SHACL document (Tuesday, 6 December)
• Re: on values (Monday, 5 December)
• on validation reports (Sunday, 4 December)
• more sloppiness in the SHACL document (Sunday, 4 December)
• Re: on values (Sunday, 4 December)
• Re: on values (Sunday, 4 December)
• Re: on values (Saturday, 3 December)
• Re: on values (Saturday, 3 December)
• Re: on values (Saturday, 3 December)
• Re: on values (Saturday, 3 December)
• on validation reports (Saturday, 3 December)
• on values (Saturday, 3 December)

Simon Spero

• Re: on the turtle serialization of SHACL (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: on the turtle serialization of SHACL (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: on the turtle serialization of SHACL (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: on values (Sunday, 4 December)

Smith, Tim

• Making SHACL Work For Industry (Wednesday, 14 December)

Solbrig, Harold R., M.S.

• Re: on values (Sunday, 4 December)

Steve Ray

• The flexibility of SPARQL/SPIN in SHACL is needed (Tuesday, 13 December)

Terry Roach

• Re: Making SHACL Work For Industry (Saturday, 17 December)
• Re: Enough already (Sunday, 11 December)
• Enough already (Saturday, 10 December)

Last message date: Saturday, 17 December 2016 09:18:02 UTC