W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > June 2008

Issue with Jena/sparql.org and XML Literals?

From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2008 09:28:23 -0400
Message-ID: <484D2FF7.1010606@digitalbazaar.com>
To: "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
CC: RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org>

Hi Andy,

I've hit an issue with Jena/sparql.org... trying to find the root of the
issue. The e-mail thread that kicked off contacting you can be found here:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Jun/0027.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Jun/0029.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Jun/0032.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Jun/0033.html

Basically, when @parseType is used to express an XML Literal in RDF/XML
instead of @datatype, the SPARQL query that checks for the typed XML
Literal fails.

Does Jena add an XML Literal type to data that is read in with a
@parseType of "Literal"?

Dave, I cc'ed you in case you might know of anything that would cause
this graph comparison to not work.

-- manu

-- 
Manu Sporny
President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
blog: DB Launches Medical Record Sales Service with Shepherd Medical
http://blog.digitalbazaar.com/2008/02/24/health2trade/
Received on Monday, 9 June 2008 13:29:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 9 June 2008 13:29:28 GMT