- From: Kevin Wilkinson <wilkinson@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 11:09:36 -0800
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon 2005-03-15 for review RDF Data Access WG telcon 2005-03-15T14:30Z Agenda: <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0304.html> Note: agenda items are renumbered in these minutes to account for two item 2's in original agenda. Additions to agenda: <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0305.html> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0306.html> IRC log: <http://www.w3.org/2005/03/15-dawg-irc> chair: DanC scribe: Kevin 1. Convene, take roll, review records and agenda Attendees: Kendall Clark, Kevin Wilkinson, Eric Prud'hommeaux, Andy Seaborne, Dan Connolly, Janne Saarela, Steve Harris, Jos De Roo, Howard Katz Regrets: Hiroyuki Sato Next meeting: 22 Mar; scribe: JanneS continue the following without discussion: ACTION Bijan: to propose text (story? etc.) to support WSDL requirement CONTINUED ACTION EricP: to review WSDL text proposal CONTINUED ACTION AndyS: to clarify 5.4 w/r/t closed world assumption CONTINUED ACTION AndyS: to explain how to get a whole graph with CONSTRUCT * and GRAPH. CONTINUED ACTION DaveB: to consider use of xsi:dataType ala comment from Steer CONTINUED ACTION EricP: to propose to close valueTesting (bonus points for test cases, to EricP or others) CONTINUED 2. ftf5-bos records PROPOSED: to approve http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ftf5-bos.html $Revision: 1.48 $ of $Date: 2005/03/07 22:37:39 $ with the @@s removed RESOLVED to approve 3. SPARQL Protocol, SADDLE update http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0286.html http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/ 1.19 is progress on some of these... ACTION KendallC: discuss warnings in the protocol spec. CONTINUED ACTION KendallC: to add WSDL description of protocol to editor's draft, propose to WG: CONTINUED ACTION KendallC: to add "since we're using WSDL, you can use WS-Policy..." to protocol draft CONTINUED ACTION KendallC: to incorporate service description discussion notes in protocol spec DONE 4. test updates from punctuationSyntax ACTION SteveH: to to propose tests for str() and =~ DONE ACTION: SteveH to update the tests to reflect the new syntax http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0298.html DONE I take that as a proposal to (re-)approve these tests: PROPOSED: to approve these tests (note rename of query-example-2* from original agenda as per addition to agenda noted, above) http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#sparql-query-example-a http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#sparql-query-example-b http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#sparql-query-example-c http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#sparql-query-example-d RESOLVED: to approve PROPOSED: to approve these tests http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#dawg-triple-pattern-001 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#dawg-triple-pattern-002 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#dawg-triple-pattern-003 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#dawg-triple-pattern-004 RESOLVED: to approve ACTION SteveH: to propose accepting the test http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#sparql-query-example-d 5. Test suite maintenance ACTION EricP: to pair with SteveH on making the HTML test results page CONTINUED ACTION SteveH: to to revise test manifest w.r.t. "background" and named graphs CONTINUED ACTION DaveB: to to propose source test to approve CONTINUED ACTION JosD: Jos to propose an optional test based on ACTION op:dateTime triple CONTINUED ACTION AndyS: to add the above graph test cases (analagous to valueTesting test cases) CONTINUED ACTION JosD: propose a test based on dawg-triple-pattern-002? with a '.' in a qname 6. Sorting issue/requirement? http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0296.html PROPOSED: add something like "it should be possible to sort the results" as a design objective RESOLVED: to accept ACTION AndyS: propose a SORT design ACTION KendallC: add a sort objective ACTION DanC: add SORT issue 7. Privacy/Security issue/requirement/objective? ACTION DanC: to consider adding 'privacy/security' issue, even if we're most likely to just postpone it or mention it in passing in specs DONE ACTION EricP: propose "privacy considerations" for SPARQL protocol ADJOURN 15:20:55
Received on Friday, 18 March 2005 19:04:08 UTC