public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org from November 2011 by subject

Aggregation w/o data?

Blank Node Ordering

Comments on Graph Store HTTP Protocol (20110512)

comments on SPARQL 1.1 Query Last Call WD: builtin functions

ENCODE_FOR_LOCAL_NAME

error in testcase agg-avg-02

Implementation details of SPARQL 1.1 Graph Store HTTP Protocol

Indirect Graph Identification

Invitation to connect on LinkedIn

LC Comment on Entailment Regimes: Class and Property Variables take DL regime beyond FOL

LC Comment on Entailment Regimes: D-Entailment Datatype Map

LC Comment on Entailment Regimes: Illegal Handling, specifically OWL 2 Direct Regime

LC Comment on Entailment Regimes: Insufficient Definition of "Entailment Regime"

LC Comment on Entailment Regimes: Treatment of Semantic Inconsistency

LC Comment: Restriction on Solutions for RDF-Based Entailment Regime

Questions concerning 11.7 (Aggregate Example (with errors))

sparql 1.1

SPARQL 1.1 - LeftJoin definition

SPARQL 1.1 Service Description - Comments

SPARQL 1.1 Service Description -- Need n3 or RDF/XML

SPARQL 1.1 Service Description comment

SPARQL Update - Clarifying correct behavior when a graph is created implicitly

str() function should also accept blank node argument

Tests assume distinct output rows are a bad idea

When is HAVING processed?

xsd:hexBinary and xsd:base64Binary entailments

Last message date: Wednesday, 30 November 2011 15:48:57 UTC